<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.4" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Geek Data - Which Airplanes Clog The U.S. Skies?</title>
	<link>http://rickseaney.com/2007/09/27/geek-data-which-airplanes-clog-the-us-skies/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 17:20:18 GMT</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.4</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Rick Seaney</title>
		<link>http://rickseaney.com/2007/09/27/geek-data-which-airplanes-clog-the-us-skies/#comment-1879</link>
		<author>Rick Seaney</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 12:58:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rickseaney.com/2007/09/27/geek-data-which-airplanes-clog-the-us-skies/#comment-1879</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Thanks Mat,

I changed the post, I guess I was sleepy when I was putting in the info.

Cheers,

Rick
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Thanks Mat,</p>
<p>I changed the post, I guess I was sleepy when I was putting in the info.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>Rick
</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mat</title>
		<link>http://rickseaney.com/2007/09/27/geek-data-which-airplanes-clog-the-us-skies/#comment-1870</link>
		<author>Mat</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 05:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rickseaney.com/2007/09/27/geek-data-which-airplanes-clog-the-us-skies/#comment-1870</guid>
		<description>Embraer 120 is not a jet aircraft, rather a turboprop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Embraer 120 is not a jet aircraft, rather a turboprop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://rickseaney.com/2007/09/27/geek-data-which-airplanes-clog-the-us-skies/#comment-1484</link>
		<author>david</author>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 20:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rickseaney.com/2007/09/27/geek-data-which-airplanes-clog-the-us-skies/#comment-1484</guid>
		<description>where are the international carriers??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>where are the international carriers??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hillrider</title>
		<link>http://rickseaney.com/2007/09/27/geek-data-which-airplanes-clog-the-us-skies/#comment-1135</link>
		<author>hillrider</author>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 00:53:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://rickseaney.com/2007/09/27/geek-data-which-airplanes-clog-the-us-skies/#comment-1135</guid>
		<description>Very interesting data dig--thanks.  It turns out that the average flight has 93.3 seats, and this includes all those tiny flights (Cessna etc) that serve tiny places.  I would expect that the average flight in/our of large and heavily congested places like JFK would have a far higher number of seats (let's say 150).  But that's not the case: according to online.wsj.com/public/article/SB118696365326095429.html , that number is only 98.  

Something to think about next time my time is wasted by being # 26 for take-off at JFK.  And why isn't the government doing anything about better use of public facilities?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting data dig&#8211;thanks.  It turns out that the average flight has 93.3 seats, and this includes all those tiny flights (Cessna etc) that serve tiny places.  I would expect that the average flight in/our of large and heavily congested places like JFK would have a far higher number of seats (let&#8217;s say 150).  But that&#8217;s not the case: according to online.wsj.com/public/article/SB118696365326095429.html , that number is only 98.  </p>
<p>Something to think about next time my time is wasted by being # 26 for take-off at JFK.  And why isn&#8217;t the government doing anything about better use of public facilities?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
