Airline Security Loophole: The Rogue Employee

June 5, 2009 | Posted in: Airport, Security, US Airways

We’ve all heard of banned items slipping past airport security – but it’s a heckuva lot easier if you skip the screening process altogether - with the help of an airline employee.

This seems to be what happened during an incident in Philadelphia yesterday.

According to MSNBC and AP reports, a US Airways customer service rep brought a bag with a handgun in it through the employees’ entrance, knowing it would not be screened there– then carried it to the gate where he and a Phoenix-bound passenger exchanged bags. The passenger then boarded the plane with the gun.

A little back story: the gun was properly registered to the passenger, and was unloaded. The incident began when he asked the US Airways employee – the two men were roommates – what the procedure was for transporting a gun on a plane. Why they allegedly decided not to follow proper procedures is anybody’s guess. Laziness?

The plan unraveled when another passenger noticed the switch, and thought the employee was acting suspiciously. The plane, which had already left the gate, was called back.

At last report, the roomies were in federal custody – and the FBI is investigating.

That’s some security loophole, huh? Readers – your thoughts?

5 Responses to “Airline Security Loophole: The Rogue Employee”

  1. James says:

    I suppose laziness is a valid thought for why one might try this. My suspicion, however, is just plain idiocy.

  2. Rick Seaney says:

    James,
    You could be right…
    Rick

  3. yourmanstan says:

    exactly what i’ve said since the beginning. airline security is pointless.

  4. Tom Umthun says:

    There is no such thing as a legally licensed “automatic” handgun for a civilian. Depending on your definition of handgun there is no such thing as an “automatic”, only semi-automatic. I know it’s a rather insignificant point in terms of having a gun in the passenger compartment of a plane where it definitely does not belong. However, your fans that believe in the 2nd Amendment would appreciate the correction. Thanks.

  5. Rick Seaney says:

    Tom,
    You are correct, the gun in question was a semiautomatic, and the post has been corrected.
    Rick

Leave a Reply

Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree