Welcome | SIGN OUT
Find a Flight
  1. Click to reset this suggestion
    Click to reset this suggestion
    Click to view the calendar
    Click to view the calendar
0 sites selected
Hint:Pick3
Please select at least 3 sites above to compare

If you search more sites, you might find better deals

Ok, I will pick moreNo thanks

Halle Berry & Family Bypass Security Line (Nice to be Famous)

January 11, 2010 | Posted in: Passengers,Security | 4 comments

halle berry family bypass security line

To paraphrase the famous cutline from one of those star-obsessed magazines — celebrities are NOT just like us.

They are richer, better looking, and — they get to bypass long security lines at the airport!

Case in point: Actress Halle Berry, 43 and her boyfriend Gabriel Aubry, 33 (he’s a model) were at the Montreal airport with their young daughter, when Aubry reportedly asked if they could get through the line more quickly “because they were late and they had the baby”.

A Canadian airport police officer obliged, and whisked them to the head of the line and through security. Nice.

Except, a journalist in the same line didn’t think it was all that nice. Marieve Paradis noted that other families with children and babies didn’t get special treatment and later wrote, “I’m not sure people from Montreal are very happy to learn that their money from their taxes is used for escorting celebrities.”

The Montreal cops later apologized and vowed that this would never happen again. “Oh, swell,” said Paris Hilton. Or did I imagine that last quote?

An Open Letter to Griping Pundits

January 11, 2010 | Posted in: Airfare News,Airline News,Pricing Activity | 4 comments

open letter griping pundits

To George Hobica,

Let me vent a little since you are too shy to call us out by name in your latest blog post — http://www.airfarewatchdog.com/blog/4097371/enough-already-with-news-reports-about-those-10-fare-hikes/ — after all, we are the ones breaking these news stories you are evidently not fond of (and, yes, you can say FareCompare on your blog, we don’t mind).

First, you call on journalists to dig deeper – might I suggest as a journalist you should also dig a bit deeper (maybe with a shovel instead of a spoon next time).

Let me enlighten you on the facts:

In 2009 there were 4 successful airfare hikes (all since June and include the one by United you mention at the end of 2009).

Domestic airfare prices were in free fall from November 2008 to May 2009 where they hit a decade-long bottom.

By contrast, there were 15 successful airfare hikes in the first 3 quarters of 2008 (subsequently prices were higher regardless of whose calculator you use), as oil prices were at century highs and airlines struggled to survive as their operating cost for fuel doubled.

You conveniently cherry pick an example of Denver to the West Coast; what you failed to mention is that Southwest stepped into the Denver market during that time frame and added dozens of flights a day in direct competition with United and Frontier which drove down the price on those limited routes — your example doesn’t even remotely reflect 99.9% of the rest of the country…

You follow that up with more misrepresentation by stating the scope of these hikes was not quantified.

On our airfare hike release of 31-Dec, which reported on the mostly $6 roundtrip hikes — with some $10 roundtrip increases — we noted the following: A) the hikes were not placed on winter sale fares for travel thru early March and, B) were not applicable on most low cost airline routes as they hadn’t matched and legacy airlines spared those routes.

These airfare hike releases were intended for the financial markets who want to know air travel pricing trends; consumers can also benefit from understanding trends as most wonder why they get wildly different prices every time they get a quote for their trip.

I could go on but I think you get my point.

Rick Seaney

CEO, FareCompare.com

Fly & Drive: A Cheaper, More Scenic Route to Your Destination

January 11, 2010 | Posted in: Deals,Destinations,Tips and Tricks | 2 comments

fly & drive cheaper scenic route destination

You know how I’m always saying you can usually save big by flying in and out of hub airports — big airports closest to your destinations.

Well, I was thinking about that while pricing flights to Vancouver from various cities for next month’s Winter Olympics.

Take a look:

The drive from Seattle to Vancouver is 3 hours; I’m told it’s beautiful in springtime, though I’m not sure if it would be quite so lovely in winter.

But say you want to visit beautiful Savannah in April. It can be expensive, unless you’re willing to drive:

Savannah is about a 4 hour drive from Atlanta, and a little more than 2-and-a-half hours from Augusta.

Only you can say if driving — often through scenic countryside — would be worth it.

Time to Ban Alcohol on Airplanes? Revisiting the Controversy

January 11, 2010 | Posted in: Airline News,News,Passengers,Travel Safety | 18 comments

time ban alcohol airplanes planes controversy

Flying means plenty of hassles these days, what with tightened security — so should we continue to allow the volatile ingredient of alcohol onboard our airlines?

Should drinking be banned?

Okay, it would be the tyranny of the few over the majority of folks who enjoy a respite from the aforementioned hassles with a cocktail — and I’m talking about all those folks who do not lose control.

But those who can’t handle liquor can make flights for the sober-minded an incredible hassle, and here are some recent examples:

  • AirTran had to divert an Atlanta to San Francisco flight because an “unruly passenger” was disruptive and locked himself in a bathroom. The man appeared to be intoxicated.
  • Another “unruly passenger” aboard a Hawaiian Airlines flight appeared intoxicated to seatmates, according to news reports; his actions eventually sent the plane back to the mainland, with an escort of military jets
  • A passenger aboard a Jet Airways flight in India got drunk and groped a flight attendant; fellow passengers had to help restrain him

Tell me — is the pleasure of having a few drinks aboard a plane worth these potential problems? Should alcohol be banned? Would the airlines ever allow this loss of revenue?

A Stink of a Smell on a Delta Plane Briefly Closes Boston Airport

January 8, 2010 | Posted in: Delta,Security,Travel Safety | 0 comments

KEYWORDS

Are we overreacting — just a tad?

Boston’s Logan International was shut down for half an hour today, due to a “suspicious smell” on or near a Delta plane. The 28 passengers were evacuated (so were the crew members) and the airport shut down.

The smell? Apparently, de-icing fluid.

UPDATE: Now we’re hearing that the odor was a “smoke smell” but they still think it came from de-icing fluid.

Anyway, all is back to normal again. Whatever normal is these days…

Virgin America Wins, Alaska Loses – VA Deemed “American”

January 8, 2010 | Posted in: Airline News,DOT | 0 comments

virgin america wins alaska loses VA deemed american

Bet you didn’t know airlines could be considered “U.S. citizens”, but it’s true. In fact, they have to be, if they want to operate as U.S. carriers.

And today the Dept. of Transportation announced that yes indeed, Virgin America is a U.S. citizen.

Here’s what happened: back in 2007, Virgin America gained citizenship, but later alerted the DOT to “a significant potential shift in its shareholder makeup”; then, about a year ago, Alaska Airlines questioned VA’s “patriotism” and yes, attempted to make a federal case out of it. It should be noted that Alaska competes with Virgin America on some West Coast routes which prompted me to call an earlier post on the subject, “Sour Grapes Make Nasty Whines” (quit groaning).

In any event, Virgin did make some changes for the DOT, and its citizenship has been proclaimed and the petition by Alaska Airlines and an airline mechanics group for a public inquiry into Virgin America’s citizenship — has been dismissed.

Somewhere, I’m sure, Richard Branson is chuckling — and enjoying his mood-lighting.

Bomb Suspect in Court Today, but You Won’t See Him (No TV)

January 8, 2010 | Posted in: Airline News,News,Security,Travel Safety | 0 comments

bomb suspect court today no TV

UPDATE: As expected, the suspect pleaded “not guilty”.

Today’s arraignment of the Christmas Day bomb suspect is expected to take place in about two hours — at 2pm Eastern time — in a federal courtroom in Detroit.

The indictment accuses the 23-year old Nigerian man of attempted murder of 279 passengers and 11 crew members onboard Northwest flight 253.

Local authorities say it’ll probably last all of two minutes or so – and there will be no camera in the courtroom (plus, no cell phones or laptops will be allowed for any spectators or press).

Just FYI.

Bomb Sniffing Dog Failures – Scary Enough to Deter Terrorists?

January 8, 2010 | Posted in: Multimedia,Security | 0 comments

Three bomb sniffing dogs who inspect cargo at Philadelphia International Airport flunked their recertification tests late last year And there are reportedly other “dog dunces” working airport security around the nation.

But the three Philly dogs are still on the job. Huh?

According to the Associated Press, the TSA says the dogs are undergoing remedial training, studying hard and hoping to pass their next final exams. Okay, they didn’t put it quite like that. Plus there are ten other dogs working the airport.

But why are these three still on the job?

Because they are a “visible deterrent”. Okay, I could see that with a big, scary looking mutt — but some of these dogs are Labradors — you know, the smiling goofballs of the canine kingdom. Don’t see the deterrence there, but then again, I might if I were a terrorist.

However, a national security advisor in the video below says, “ornamental dogs are not of much use.” I see his point (I also suspect this’ll end any speculation about drafting replacements bomb sniffing dogs from that glut of Chihuahuas in California). Take a look at the video and share your thoughts:

Page 9 of 12« First...7891011...Last »